欢迎访问心血管病防治知识,今天是

心血管病防治知识 ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (7): 40-45.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

双高权重自适应统计迭代重建冠状动脉CT血管成像联合人工智能评估冠心病的临床价值

方子榕, 叶灵, 余波, 陈秋雁, 林基表, 余燕武*   

  1. 宁德市医院,福建 宁德 352100
  • 出版日期:2026-04-15 发布日期:2026-07-29
  • 通讯作者: *余燕武
  • 基金资助:
    宁德市自然科学基金联合项目 (2023J01)

Clinical value of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V coronary CT angiography combined with artificial intelligence in evaluating coronary heart disease

FANG Zirong, YE Ling, YU Bo, CHEN Qiuyan, LIN Jibiao, YU Yanwu*   

  1. Ningde Municipal Hospital, Ningde 352100, China
  • Online:2026-04-15 Published:2026-07-29

摘要: 目的 探讨双高权重自适应统计迭代重建(ASIR-V)冠状动脉CT血管成像(CCTA)联合人工智能(AI)评估冠心病(CHD)的临床价值。方法 前瞻性将124例行CCTA的疑似冠心病(CHD)患者以常规CCTA参数,噪声指数(NI)11,前、后置ASIR-V 50%为对照组,以高权重后置ASIR-V 90%,前置ASIR-V分别为60%、70%、80%作为实验组。对图像质量进行5分法主观评分,计算信噪比(SNR)、对比噪声比(CNR)、有效剂量(ED),对比各组图像间的主观评分、噪声(SD)、SNR、CNR、ED。优化出图像质量高而ED低的组别进行AI分析,以冠状动脉造影(CAG)结果为金标准,血管狭窄程度≥50%记为阳性,绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,评估AI的诊断效能。结果 对照组与前置ASIR-V 80%组的主观评分(4.61±0.50 vs 4.26±0.58)、SD(36.15±6.82 vs 42.08±7.98)、AR SNR(13.56±3.51 vs 11.26(8.67,13.02))、AR CNR(11.50±3.14 vs 9.52±2.70)、RCA SNR(12.82±3.29 vs 10.40(8.18,12.06))、RCA CNR(10.76±2.93 vs 8.75±2.59)、LCX SNR(12.45±3.26 vs 10.35±2.56)组间差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05),对照组的SD低于前置ASIR-V 80%组,其余参数值高于前置ASIR-V 80%组。优化组为前置ASIR-V 70%组,其AI分析结果对诊断血管狭窄程度≥50%的AUC为0.911,敏感度为0.935,特异度为0.888,阳性预测值为0.811,阴性预测值为0.963,准确率为0.904。结论 后置ASIR-V 90%,前置ASIR-V 70%的CCTA参数能够保证图像质量的同时降低辐射剂量,其AI分析结果对诊断CHD有高诊断价值。

关键词: 冠状动脉CT血管成像, 自适应统计迭代重建, 人工智能, 冠心病

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical value of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) coronary CT angiography (CCTA) combined with artificial intelligence (AI) in evaluating coronary heart disease (CHD). Methods A prospective study was conducted among 124 patients suspected of CHD who underwent CCTA. The control group was established based on the conventional CCTA parameters including a Noise Index (NI) of 11 and anterior and posterior ASIR-V of 50%, and the experimental groups were established based on the high-weighted posterior ASIR-V of 90%, combined with anterior ASIR-V settings of 60%, 70%, and 80%, respectively. Image quality was assessed subjectively using a 5-point scale, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and effective dose (ED) were calculated. The above groups were compared in terms of subjective scores, noise (SD), SNR, CNR, and ED. The group with high image quality and low ED was selected for AI analysis, and with coronary angiography (CAG) results as the gold standard, vascular stenosis ≥ 50% was defined as positive cases. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to assess the diagnostic performance of AI. Results There were significant differences between the control group and the anterior ASIR-V 80% group in subjective score (4.61± 0.50 vs 4.26± 0.58, P < 0.05), SD (36.15± 6.82 vs 42.08± 7.98, P < 0.05), AR SNR [13.56± 3.51 vs 11.26 (8.67, 13.02), P < 0.05], AR CNR (11.50± 3.14 vs 9.52± 2.70, P < 0.05), RCA SNR [12.82± 3.29 vs 10.40 (8.18, 12.06), P < 0.05], RCA CNR (10.76± 2.93 vs 8.75± 2.59, P < 0.05), and LCX SNR (12.45± 3.26 vs 10.35± 2.56, P < 0.05), and compared with the anterior ASIR-V 80% group, the control group had a significantly lower SD and significantly higher levels of the other parameters. For the anterior ASIR-V 70% group, AI results yielded an AUC of 0.911 for diagnosing vascular stenosis ≥ 50%, with a sensitivity of 0.935, a specificity of 0.888, a positive predictive value of 0.811, a negative predictive value of 0.963, and an accuracy of 0.904. Conclusion CCTA parameters of posterior ASIR-V 90% and anterior ASIR-V 70% can ensure image quality while reducing the radiation dose, and their AI analysis results have a high diagnostic value for CHD.

Key words: Coronary CT angiography, Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V, Artificial intelligence, Coronary heart disease