急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后七步法运动结合身心全面系统干预的康复效果

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后七步法运动结合身心全面系统干预的康复效果。方法选取我院2022年1-12月收治80例急性心肌梗死PCI治疗患者为研究对象,以信封法随机分为对照组（n=40）和观察组（n=40）。分别给予常规护理和七步法运动结合身心全面系统干预,对两组患者心功能指标（LVESD、LVEDD）、并发症发生率、MBI评分进行观察和比较。结果两组干预前,心功能指标、MBI评分比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;观察组干预后LVESD、LVEDD较对照组低（P<0.05）;观察组并发症发生率2.50%,低于对照组20.00%（P<0.05）;观察组干预后MBI评分明显优于照组低（P<0.05）。结论急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后七步法运动结合身心全面系统干预,有利于心功能改善,保证患者的安全性,应用价值较高。

关键词: 急性心肌梗死, PCI, 七步法运动, 身心全面系统干预

陈榕, 朱丹红. 急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后七步法运动结合身心全面系统干预的康复效果[J]. 心血管病防治知识, 2024, 14(3): 83-86.

参考文献

[1] Cartledge S, Driscoll A, Dinh D, et al. Trends and Predictors of Cardiac Rehabilitation Referral Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A?Prospective, Multi-Site Study of 41,739 Patients From the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (2017-2020)[J]. Heart Lung Circ, 2022,31(9):1247-1254.
[2] Vargas-Fernández R, Chacón-Diaz M, Basualdo-Meléndez GW, et al. Late myocardial reperfusion in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMJ Open, 2022,12(9):e059610.
[3] Sagheer S, Deka P, Pathak D, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Hospitalizations With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: An Analysis of Nationwide Readmissions Database[J]. Curr Probl Cardiol, 2022,47(11):101086.
[4] Vallabhajosyula S, Vallabhajosyula S, Dunlay SM, et al. Sex and Gender Disparities in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock in?Older Adults[J]. Mayo Clin Proc, 2020,95(9):1916-1927.
[5] Chen B, Wen J, You D, et al. Implication of cognitive-behavioral stress management on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in acute myocardial infarction patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study[J]. Ir J Med Sci, 2023
[6] 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南(2019)[J].中华心血管病杂志,2019,47(10):766-783.
[7] Will M, Schwarz K, Weiss T, et al. The impact of chronic total occlusions in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2023,101(4):806-812.
[8] Allen KB, Alexander JE, Liberman JN, et al. Implications of Payment for Acute Myocardial Infarctions as a 90-Day Bundled Single Episode of Care: A Cost of Illness Analysis[J]. Pharmacoecon Open, 2022,6(6):799-809.
[9] Yu Q, Guo D, Peng J, et al. Prevalence and adverse outcomes of frailty in older patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Cardiol, 2023,46(1):5-12.
[10] Peng X, Zhang J, Wan L, et al. The effect of a seven-step rehabilitation training program on cardiac function and quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2022,38(1):123-127.
[11] Cao X, Wu J, Gu Y, et al. Post-traumatic Stress Disorder and Risk Factors in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction After Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Longitudinal Study[J]. Front Psychol, 2021,12:694974.
[12] Mori M, Djulbegovic M, Hajduk AM, et al. Changes in Functional Status and Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Adults After Surgical, Interventional, or Medical Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction[J]. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2021,33(1):72-81.
[13] Sung PH, Huang WC, Chao TH, et al. Intra-Coronary Administration of Tacrolimus Improves Myocardial Perfusion and Left Ventricular Function in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (COAT-STEMI) Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention[J]. Acta Cardiol Sin, 2021,37(3):239-253.
[14] Yu H, Yang H. Effect of early home-based exercise for cardiac rehabilitation on the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2021,13(7):7839-7847.
[15] Kulkarni H, Thangam M, Amin AP. Artificial neural network-based prediction of prolonged length of stay and need for post-acute care in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Eur J Clin Invest, 2021,51(3):e13406.