欢迎访问心血管病防治知识,今天是

心血管病防治知识 ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (27): 6-9.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

经食道与经胸超声心动图评估右心室收缩力的对比研究

马宁帅, 袁玺   

  1. 川北医学院附属医院,四川 南充 637000
  • 出版日期:2021-09-25 发布日期:2022-01-25
  • 基金资助:
    四川省卫生健康课题(20PJ151)

Effect of transesophageal versus transthoracic echocardiography in evaluating right ventricular contractibility

MA Ning-shuai, YUAN Xi   

  1. Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, China
  • Online:2021-09-25 Published:2022-01-25

摘要: 目的 比较经胸和经食道超声心动图评估右心室收缩力,分析传统的测量方法和斑点追踪技术测量值的相关性和一致性。方法 前瞻性纳入49例患者,所有患者均同步(检查时间相距均不超过24h)行经胸及经食道超声心动图检查,分别测量三尖瓣环收缩期位移、三尖瓣环收缩期速率及右心室游离壁心肌应变。每项参数均采用传统的M型、组织多普勒超声技术及斑点追踪技术。比较经胸及经食道超声心动图的测量值之间的差异。结果 传统M型、组织多普勒技术:与经胸超声心动图相比,经食管中段超声心动图的三尖瓣环收缩期位移和速率被低估了(平均±标准差。三尖瓣环收缩期位移:12.1±2.8 mm vs 17.2±3.8 mm;三尖瓣环收缩期速率:6.5±2.2cm/s vs 9.1±2.1cm/s;均为P<0.05)。斑点追踪三尖瓣环收缩期位移,无明显偏差,但变异性大(平均偏差为-0.3mm,95%的一致范围为-8.7至7.9);TEE的应变和应变率比TTE高(-18.8±3.6 vs -12.8±1.9,P<0.05;-1.1±0.2 vs -0.6±0.1/s,P<0.05)。结论 经食道与经胸超声心动图使用传统方法测量的右心室收缩力参数(三尖瓣环收缩期位移、三尖瓣环收缩期速率及右心室游离壁心肌应变)相关性高,通过斑点追踪的三尖瓣环收缩期位移是无偏差的,但在实际应用中需要注意具体测量数据的差异。

关键词: 右心室, 超声心动图, 三尖瓣环收缩期位移, 三尖瓣环收缩期速率, 斑点追踪

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) versus transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in evaluating right ventricular contractibility, as well as the correlation and consistency between conventional measurement method and speckle tracking echocardiography. Methods A total of 49 patients were enrolled in this prospective study, and all patients underwent TTE and TEE simultaneously (with an interval of no more than 24 hours) to measure tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, tricuspid annular plane systolic velocity, and myocardial strain of the right ventricular free wall. Each parameter was determined by both conventional M-type Doppler tissue imaging and speckle tracking echocardiography, and the measured values were compared between TTE and TEE. Results For conventional M-type Doppler tissue imaging, compared with TTE, TEE underestimated tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (12.1±2.8 mm vs 17.2±3.8 mm, P<0.05) and tricuspid annular plane systolic velocity (6.5±2.2 cm/s vs 9.1±2.1 cm/s, P<0.05). Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion measured by speckle tracking showed no significant deviation and a high degree of variability, with a mean deviation of -0.3 mm and a 95% consistency range of -8.7 to 7.9, and strain and strain rate measured by TEE were significantly higher than those measured by TTE (strain: -18.8±3.6 vs -12.8±1.9, P<0.05; strain rate: -1.1±0.2/s vs -0.6±0.1/s, P<0.05). Conclusion There is a high degree of correlation between the parameters of right ventricular contractibility (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, tricuspid annular plane systolic velocity, and myocardial strain of the right ventricular free wall) measured by TEE and TTE using the conventional method. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion measured by speckle tracking has no deviation, but the difference in the specific data measured should be taken seriously in practical application.

Key words: Right ventricle, Echocardiography, Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, Tricuspid annular plane systolic velocity, Speckle tracking