欢迎访问心血管病防治知识,今天是

心血管病防治知识 ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (29): 60-63.

• 护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

多学科协作出院指导在心脏外科术后患者中的应用

罗春凤, 郭子涛   

  1. 珠海市人民医院·暨南大学附属珠海医院,广东 珠海 519000
  • 出版日期:2023-10-15 发布日期:2024-04-17
  • 基金资助:
    课题项目:珠海市医学科研基金项目;项目编号:ZH24013310210031PWC

Application of multidisciplinary discharge instruction for patients after cardiac surgery

LUO Chunfeng, GUO Zitao   

  1. Zhuhai People's Hospital &Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated to Jinan University, Zhuhai 519000, China
  • Online:2023-10-15 Published:2024-04-17

摘要: 目的 探讨多学科协作出院指导在心脏外科术后患者中的应用效果。方法 2021年4月至2022年9月,采用便利抽样法选取珠海市人民医院收治的81例心脏手术患者为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为对照组(n=40)与干预组(n=41)。对照组实施常规出院指导,干预组实施多学科协作出院指导。于出院时采用出院准备度量表(RHDS)、出院指导质量量表(QDTS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁评分量表(SDS)测评两组患者的出院准备度、出院指导质量及心理状态,比较两组患者出院后1个月、3个月的非计划再入院率。结果 干预组出院时RHDS评分、QDTS评分高于对照组,SAS评分、SDS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预组出院后1个月、3个月的非计划再入院率与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 对心脏外科术后患者实施多学科协作出院指导,可改善患者出院指导质量,提高患者出院准备度,缓解患者出院时焦虑、抑郁情绪。

关键词: 心脏外科, 出院指导, 多学科协作, 出院准备度, 出院指导质量

Abstract: Objective To investigate the application effect of multidisciplinary discharge instruction for patients after cardiac surgery. Methods A total of 81 patients who were admitted to Zhuhai People's Hospital and underwent cardiac surgery from April, 2021 to September, 2022 were selected as subjects by the convenience sampling method, and they were divided into control group with 40 patients and intervention group with 41 patients using a random number table. The patients in the control group received routine discharge instruction, and those in the intervention group received multidisciplinary discharge instruction. At discharge, Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS), Quality of Discharge Teaching Scale (QDTS), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SAS), and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) were used to assess the readiness for discharge, the quality of discharge instruction, and the psychological state of patients, and the two groups were compared in terms of unscheduled readmission rate at 1 and 3 months after discharge. Results Compared with the control group, the intervention group had significantly higher RHDS and QDTS scores and significantly lower SAS and SDS scores (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in unplanned readmission rate between the intervention group and the control group at 1 and 3 months after discharge (P>0.05). Conclusion Multidisciplinary discharge instruction for patients after cardiac surgery can improve the quality of discharge instruction, increase the readiness for hospital discharge, and alleviate the anxiety and depression mood of patients at discharge.

Key words: Cardiac surgery, Discharge instruction, Multidisciplinary cooperation, Readiness for discharge, Quality of discharge instruction