欢迎访问心血管病防治知识,今天是

心血管病防治知识 ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1): 81-84.

• 护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

慢性疾病轨迹模式护理干预加激励式护理对老年冠心病患者的效果

刘茵萌   

  1. 山东大学齐鲁医院,山东 济南 250000
  • 出版日期:2023-01-05 发布日期:2023-04-25

Effect of nursing intervention with chronic disease trajectory mode combined with incentive nursing on elderly patients with coronary heart disease

LIU Yin-meng   

  1. Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
  • Online:2023-01-05 Published:2023-04-25

摘要: 目的 探讨慢性疾病轨迹模式护理干预联合激励式护理实施于老年冠心病患者中的应用价值。方法 在严格纳排标准下,选择2018年7月至2022年3月收治的76例老年冠心病患者,以系统抽样法原则下做分组处理,组别记为对照组与观察组,每组38例,对照组实施常规护理,观察组实行慢性疾病轨迹模式护理干预联合激励式护理;评估两组心理状态、不良心血管事件发症率、生活质量并展开组间对比。结果 两组干预前SAS、SDS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组干预后SAS、SDS评分较对照组显著低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组不良心血管事件发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预后,生活质量即SF-36评分观察组显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 慢性疾病轨迹模式护理干预联合激励式护理实施于老年冠心病患者中,一方面可消除焦虑抑郁,有效控制不良心血管事件的发生,另一方面全面提高患者生活质量,取得良好预后结果。

关键词: 慢性疾病轨迹模式, 护理干预, 激励式护理, 冠心病

Abstract: Objective To investigate the application value of nursing intervention with chronic disease trajectory mode combined with incentive nursing in elderly patients with coronary heart disease. Methods Based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, 76 elderly patients with coronary heart disease who were admitted from July 2018 to March 2022 were enrolled and divided into control group and observation group according to the principle of systematic sampling, with 38 patients in each group. The patients in the control group were given routine nursing, and those in the observation group were given nursing intervention with chronic disease trajectory mode combined with incentive nursing. The two groups were compared in terms of psychological state, the incidence rate of adverse cardiovascular events, and quality of life. Results Before intervention, there were no significant differences in Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores between the two groups (P>0.05), while after intervention, the observation group had significantly lower SAS and SDS scores than the control group (P<0.05). The observation group had a significantly lower incidence rate of adverse cardiovascular events than the control group (P<0.05). After intervention, compared with the control group, the observation group had a significantly higher quality of life score based on 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (P<0.05). Conclusion In elderly patients with coronary heart disease, nursing intervention with chronic disease trajectory mode combined with incentive nursing can alleviate anxiety and depression, effectively control the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular events, and comprehensively improve the quality of life of patients, thereby achieving a good prognosis.

Key words: Chronic disease trajectory mode, Nursing intervention, Incentive nursing, Coronary heart disease