Loading...
Home
About Journal
Editorial Board
Instruction
Subscription
Journal Online
Advertisement
Contact Us
中文
Forthcoming Articles
Current Issue
Archive
Download Articles
Read Articles
Most Cited Articles
Office
Online Submission
Peer Review
Editor Work
Office Work
Editor-in-Chief
Journal
Forthcoming Articles
Current Issue
Archive
Read Articles
Download Articles
Most Cited Articles
E-mail Alert
RSS
Visited
Total visitors:
Visitors of today:
Now online:
Table of Content
25 November 2019, Volume 9 Issue 22
Previous Issue
Next Issue
Clinical effect of atorvastatin calcium versus rosuvastatin in treatment of hyperlipidemia
LI Guo-ping
2019, 9(22): 18-20.
Abstract
(
79
)
PDF
(426KB) (
97
)
References
|
Related Articles
|
Metrics
Objective
Toinvestigate the clinical effect of atorvastatin calcium versus rosuvastatin in the treatment of hyperlipidemia and their influence on hepatic and renal function, myocardial enzyme, and blood glucose.
Methods
The clinical data of 68 patients with hyperlipidemia were collected, and these patients were divided into atorvastatin calcium group and rosuvastatin group, with 34 patients in each group. The two groups were compared in terms of triglyceride, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase, creatine kinase-MB, uric acid, creatinine, urea nitrogen, and fasting blood glucose before and after treatment.
Results
Both groups had significant reductions in triglyceride, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein after treatment (
P
<0.05), while there were no significant changes in high-density lipoprotein, fasting blood glucose, and myocardial enzyme after treatment (
P
>0.05).
Conclusion
Atorvastatin calcium and rosuvastatin have a similar effect in reducingtriglyceride, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein, with little influence on liver and renal function, myocardial zymogram, and blood glucose.